- Aug 19, 2011
-
-
Robert Morris authored
-
- Aug 15, 2011
-
-
Robert Morris authored
-
- Aug 12, 2011
-
-
Robert Morris authored
usertest for big write()s push begin_trans/commit_trans down into syscalls
-
- Aug 08, 2011
-
-
Frans Kaashoek authored
-
- Aug 07, 2011
-
-
Frans Kaashoek authored
All tests pass
-
- Feb 19, 2011
-
-
Russ Cox authored
-
- Jan 11, 2011
-
-
Russ Cox authored
Variable declarations at top of function, separate from initialization. Use == 0 instead of ! for checking pointers. Consistent spacing around {, *, casts. Declare 0-parameter functions as (void) not (). Integer valued functions return -1 on failure, 0 on success.
-
- Sep 27, 2010
-
-
Robert Morris authored
usertest that passes too many arguments, break exec
-
- Sep 20, 2010
-
-
Robert Morris authored
-
- Sep 19, 2010
-
-
Robert Morris authored
-
- Sep 01, 2010
-
-
Austin Clements authored
Remove the stack guard page. Processes are now contiguous from 0 to proc->sz, which means our syscall argument validation is correct. Add a pointer validation test and remove the stack test, which tested for the guard page.
-
- Aug 31, 2010
-
-
Austin Clements authored
-
Austin Clements authored
-
- Aug 11, 2010
-
-
Robert Morris authored
increase PHYSTOP
-
- Aug 10, 2010
-
-
Robert Morris authored
-
- Aug 06, 2010
-
-
Robert Morris authored
put an invalid page below the stack have fork() handle invalid pages
-
- Aug 05, 2010
-
-
Robert Morris authored
(maybe this never worked, but it works now)
-
- May 30, 2009
-
-
rsc authored
group locks into structs they protect. few naming nits.
-
- Sep 27, 2007
-
-
rsc authored
-
- Sep 26, 2007
-
-
rsc authored
the macro expansion of "char *cp;" turned into char *(curproc[cpu()]); which declares a dynamically sized array of char* called curproc. so then &cp == &(curproc[cpu()]) was actually a stack variable as "expected". it was one past the end of the array, but the implicit alloca allocated more than was necessary. do not tell me that making cp a #define was a bad idea. there are worse problems to fix. more on that later.
-
rsc authored
-
- Aug 24, 2007
- Aug 21, 2007
-
-
rsc authored
-
- Aug 20, 2007
-
-
rsc authored
-
- Aug 10, 2007
- Aug 08, 2007
- Sep 07, 2006
- Sep 06, 2006
-
-
rsc authored
-
- Aug 29, 2006
- Aug 24, 2006