-
Jennifer Mankoff authoredJennifer Mankoff authored
multi-person.html 6.40 KiB
---
layout: presentation
title: FOOBAR --Week N--
description: Accessibility
class: middle, center, inverse
---
background-image: url(img/people.png)
.left-column50[
# Welcome to the Future of Access Technologies
Week N, FOOBAR
{{site.classnum}}, {{site.quarter}}
]
---
name: normal
layout: true
class:
---
# Important Reminder
## This is an important reminder
## Make sure zoom is running and recording!!!
---
[//]: # (Outline Slide)
# Learning Goals for today
---
# Topics
- Video conferencing accessibility
- Understanding different access needs of different participants + access conflicts
- Identifying built-in accessibility features
- Access practices to navigate inaccessibility / role of sociocultural https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3479578
- Connections:
- Privacy concerns with captioning
- Machine learning bias in speech recognition
- Collaborative coding / writing
- https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3359293
- https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3517428.3544812
- Crowdsourced accessibility (not sure if this fits here but mostly thinking of how cscw systems can help provision access as well)
- SoundPrint, DeafFriendly, BeMyEyes
- Opensource projects: NVDA
- Datasets: VizWhiz, ASLCitizen
---
# Study of End User Content Creation
Although guidelines for tools and for authorship exist, inaccessible
content is still created.
- How do communities react
- How could authoring tools help this?
.quote[I wan't able to read your entire post.
Maybe you could go back and break up your paragraphs so they are easier to read?]
???
This quote is taken from a study investigating communities that take an active role in fostering a culture of accessibility, using both formal and informal practices of moderating inaccessible content.
---
# Case Study 1: Wikipedia
Sample size: 179 discussions, 82 contributors
Of 82, 10 “moderators” – declared members