Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

updates to hw3.

Merged Venkatesh Potluri requested to merge vpotluri/hw3-updates into UACCESS-23fa

Overview

This PR makes changes to HW2, and leaves some to-dos and questions for Jen.

description of changes

  • added a small component to be consistent with using skils they already learned to the participation score. Can we adopt this for all homeworks?
  • updated optional reading. the race plus alt-text paper did not feel like the most appropriate because we are saying they may be practicing UI descriptions. linked to a UDescribe instructional video that models ui descriptions.
  • Updated description of second AT under subheading Collect Data on accessibility problems
  • updated turn-in.

to-dos

for @khanna38

  • Review changes, website pages, and fix any issues.
  • modify accessible document creation rubric on canvas with information about violations. Please let me know if you have any questions.
  • mark this PR ready but do not merge after you are done with the to-dos.

questions for @jmankoff

  • point to definitions for terms of frequency, impact and persistence. what would be a good link to include?
  • unable to find cosmetic definition for civerity in the article you suggested. I however found another article and updated the doc. Is this ok?
  • rubric "Comfortable Applying Web/App Accessibility Rules": only the first rating does not have a count such as one or more... how do we grade for "Correctly assigns from WCAG guideline areas to all found problems (or says if they are not applicable) and demonstrates understanding of guideline areas" and "Correctly draws from at least two WCAG guideline areas and assigns to all problems"?
  • "Accessibility Problem Fixes" may not be applicable to this homework. Should we remove it? I reviewed the spec after our chat conversation but couldn't find a suggestion to improve. I may have missed something though but I wanted to bring this to your attention again.
  • [ ]
Edited by Venkatesh Potluri

Merge request reports

Loading
Loading

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
  • Venkatesh Potluri requested review from @jmankoff

    requested review from @jmankoff

  • Jennifer Mankoff marked the checklist item unable to find cosmetic definition for civerity in the article you suggested. I however found another article and updated the doc. Is this ok? as completed

    marked the checklist item unable to find cosmetic definition for civerity in the article you suggested. I however found another article and updated the doc. Is this ok? as completed

  • Hi Venkatesh, -

    1. I don't have a good link for the definitions aside from what we said in class.
    2. Sure
    3. That's a good question. It's probably going to need updating and we should discuss it more on Thursday.
    4. I fixed the spec to put that in -- it was mentioned in the slides but not the spec.
  • Jennifer Mankoff added 3 commits

    added 3 commits

    Compare with previous version

  • Jennifer Mankoff marked the checklist item "Accessibility Problem Fixes" may not be applicable to this homework. Should we remove it? I reviewed the spec after our chat conversation but couldn't find a suggestion to improve. I may have missed something though but I wanted to bring this to your attention again. as completed

    marked the checklist item "Accessibility Problem Fixes" may not be applicable to this homework. Should we remove it? I reviewed the spec after our chat conversation but couldn't find a suggestion to improve. I may have missed something though but I wanted to bring this to your attention again. as completed

  • Dhruv marked the checklist item Review changes, website pages, and fix any issues. as completed

    marked the checklist item Review changes, website pages, and fix any issues. as completed

  • @vpotluri I am unable to edit the rubric. Also, not sure what to add for the violations. Should the rubric be made from the university's policy on accessible docs. I found this link on the University's policy.

    Edited by Dhruv
  • The canvas rubric is separate from updating the website. @vpotluri if you feel the website changes are all addressed, we should merge asap.

  • Dhruv marked the checklist item mark this PR ready but do not merge after you are done with the to-dos. as completed

    marked the checklist item mark this PR ready but do not merge after you are done with the to-dos. as completed

  • Dhruv marked this merge request as ready

    marked this merge request as ready

  • Venkatesh Potluri marked the checklist item modify accessible document creation rubric on canvas with information about violations. Please let me know if you have any questions. as completed

    marked the checklist item modify accessible document creation rubric on canvas with information about violations. Please let me know if you have any questions. as completed

  • Venkatesh Potluri marked the checklist item point to definitions for terms of frequency, impact and persistence. what would be a good link to include? as completed

    marked the checklist item point to definitions for terms of frequency, impact and persistence. what would be a good link to include? as completed

  • Venkatesh Potluri marked the checklist item rubric "Comfortable Applying Web/App Accessibility Rules": only the first rating does not have a count such as one or more... how do we grade for "Correctly assigns from WCAG guideline areas to all found problems (or says if they are not applicable) and demonstrates understanding of guideline areas" and "Correctly draws from at least two WCAG guideline areas and assigns to all problems"? as completed

    marked the checklist item rubric "Comfortable Applying Web/App Accessibility Rules": only the first rating does not have a count such as one or more... how do we grade for "Correctly assigns from WCAG guideline areas to all found problems (or says if they are not applicable) and demonstrates understanding of guideline areas" and "Correctly draws from at least two WCAG guideline areas and assigns to all problems"? as completed

  • looks good to me. transfering remaining checklist items to todos doc and merging.

  • mentioned in commit 797d7c3e

Please register or sign in to reply
Loading