diff --git a/assets/css/my-remark.scss b/assets/css/my-remark.scss
index 48600c2922d40d7c8cd08f12661d47a345272424..853a402eb273df0ae258612d713c3401337030a6 100644
--- a/assets/css/my-remark.scss
+++ b/assets/css/my-remark.scss
@@ -4,15 +4,17 @@
$fa-font-path: "../fonts/font-awesome/";
@import 'fontawesome.all.min.css';
@import "remark-base";
-$body-font: 22pt;
-$list-font: 20pt;
+$body-font: 28pt;
+$list-font: 24pt;
$code-font: 18pt;
-$mediumsmall-font: 16pt;
-$title-font: 28pt;
+$mediumsmall-font: 20pt;
+$title-font: 2em;
+$h2-font: 1.5em;
$footnote-font: 12pt;
$blue: #0066ff;
$lightblue: #39d;
$lightgreen: #2c7;
+$green: #8fb47d;
$turqouise: #1b9;
$purple: #95b;
$violet: #ffe6ff;
@@ -99,7 +101,11 @@ pre {
ul {
font-size: $list-font;
}
-
+
+ol {
+ font-size: $list-font;
+}
+
.remark-code {
font-family: 'Ubuntu Mono';
font-size: $code-font;
@@ -224,7 +230,7 @@ blockquote p {
color: $light;
}
.p {
- font-size: 1.5em;
+ font-size: $body-font;
}
.footnote {
font-size: $footnote-font;
@@ -251,6 +257,15 @@ blockquote p {
padding-left: 1em;
}
+.remark-slide-content h1 {
+ font-size: $title-font;
+}
+
+.remark-slide-content h2 {
+ font-size: $h2-font;
+}
+
+
.remark-slide-content {
background-position: right;
font-size: $body-font;
@@ -270,10 +285,10 @@ body.compact {
}
.font-medium {
- font-size: $list-font !important;
+ font-size: $list-font;
}
.font-mediumsmall {
- font-size: $mediumsmall-font !important;
+ font-size: $mediumsmall-font;
}
.font-smaller {
@@ -297,6 +312,10 @@ body.compact {
color: $lightest;
}
+.green {
+ color: $green;
+}
+
.contrast71 {
color: #2E2EFF;
background: #FFFFFF;
@@ -357,6 +376,7 @@ body.compact {
left: -50px;
text-align: center;
line-height: 50px;
+ font-size: $mediumsmall-font;
letter-spacing: 1px;
color: $light;
transform: rotate(-45deg);
@@ -408,10 +428,10 @@ body.compact {
}
.corner-ribbon.tr{
- top: 100px;
- left: 500px;
+ top: 150px;
+ left: 850px;
font-size: $body-font;
- width: 1000px;
+ width: 500px;
transform: rotate(45deg);
-webkit-transform: rotate(45deg);
z-index: 10;
diff --git a/schedule.md b/schedule.md
index 85bb9849a2eeda8040ce68e4800752b451689543..7efc11896ef20d185656231dfd25da5a1293d92f 100644
--- a/schedule.md
+++ b/schedule.md
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ I'm also thinking about having them use fusion360 or something else to make some
: Break / Food
{: .topic } 6:45- ~8:00
-: Sustainability and Accessibility
+: **Slides** {% include slide.html title="Sustainability and Accessibility" loc="sustainability.html" %}
{: .topic } 7:30-8:30
: Group project check ins (you can leave if your group is meeting with Jen at a different time)
diff --git a/slides/sustainability.html b/slides/sustainability.html
index 307fa32b4feeb1c4cfb2fe4f3ac025017ab40021..ee6d8fb4a5bf915c523ee6915d4890654dedeb8c 100644
--- a/slides/sustainability.html
+++ b/slides/sustainability.html
@@ -42,14 +42,15 @@ and climate change
---
+Quote from “Disability, Climate Change, and Environmental Violence: The Politics of Invisibility and the Horizon of Hope†by Julia Watts Belser (Disability Studies Quarterly)
+
.quote[Disability politics offer a vital resource for grappling with climate change…
[they reveal] the political stakes of diagnosis—the way power contours how, when, and to what ends we recognize human and ecological impairment.]
-Quote from “Disability, Climate Change, and Environmental Violence: The Politics of Invisibility and the Horizon of Hope†by Julia Watts Belser (Disability Studies Quarterly)
---
-# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis
+# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis (1/10)
- Government Services & Civic Engagement
@@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ Essential to changing how we address climate change,
and implementation of the same
---
-# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis
+# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis (2/10)
- Government Services & Civic Engagement
- Process Accessibility
@@ -67,15 +68,11 @@ and implementation of the same
---
# Example: Disaster Response Planning
-Decisions about who is included (e.g. disaster response plans) are often ableist -- actively de-prioritizing disabled lives
-
+- Decisions about who is included (e.g. disaster response plans) are often ableist -- actively de-prioritizing disabled lives
- E.g. during COVID; Hurricane Katrina
-
-Emergency broadcasts often inaccessible (e.g. no captions; inaccessible data visualizations; no ASL interpretation; inaccessible websites)
-
-Disabled people are often institutionalized (e.g. prison; hospital; “nursing homesâ€) and many institutions are deprioritized
-
-Shelters may refuse people with disabilities
+- Emergency broadcasts often inaccessible (e.g. no captions; inaccessible data visualizations; no ASL interpretation; inaccessible websites)
+- Disabled people are often institutionalized (e.g. prison; hospital; “nursing homesâ€) and many institutions are deprioritized
+- Shelters may refuse people with disabilities
---
# Example: Conservation
@@ -86,17 +83,17 @@ Yet such changes often fail to account for accessibility concerns (e.g. straws;
---
-# Governmentality, ableism & racism
+# Governmentality, Ableism & Racism (1/2)
.left-column50[
-
+
]
---
-# Governmentality, ableism & racism
+# Governmentality, Ableism & Racism (2/2)
.left-column50[
@@ -109,34 +106,26 @@ This differentially impacts people of color, low-income people and people with d
]
---
-# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis
+# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis (3/10)
- Government Services & Civic Engagement
-
-Accessibility must be considered in the government response to climate change. Accessibility can impact safety, civic engagement, access to services, and who is included in the democratic process
-
-Top down decisions that don’t include people multiple viewpoints can be problematic
-
-Give choice/agency to people many backgrounds
-
-Give responsibility for support to governmental context
+ - Accessibility must be considered in the government response to climate change. Accessibility can impact safety, civic engagement, access to services, and who is included in the democratic process
+ - Top down decisions that don’t include people multiple viewpoints can be problematic
+- Give choice/agency to people many backgrounds
+- Give responsibility for support to governmental context
---
-# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis
+# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis (4/10)
- Government Services & Civic Engagement
- Education
-
-Source of future leaders and decision makers
-
-Source of future innovators
-
-Strongly associated with things that can help to mitigate climate change, such as empowered family planning for women
-
-Also generally not designed to include people with disabilities
+ - Source of future leaders and decision makers
+ - Source of future innovators
+ - Strongly associated with things that can help to mitigate climate change, such as empowered family planning for women
+ - Also generally not designed to include people with disabilities
---
-# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis
+# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis (5/10)
- Government Services & Civic Engagement
- Education
@@ -146,7 +135,7 @@ Also generally not designed to include people with disabilities
- Lots of improvement possible -- disabled students felt MUCH more supported during COVID [TACCESS 2022]
---
-# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis
+# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis (6/10)
- Government Services & Civic Engagement
- Education
@@ -157,7 +146,7 @@ Also generally not designed to include people with disabilities
- Can change the balance of power
---
-# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis
+# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis (7/10)
- Government Services & Civic Engagement
- Education
@@ -201,23 +190,23 @@ Spend greater percentages of income on energy
<iframe src="https://embed.polleverywhere.com/free_text_polls/6BulXYeFmPsbUKKaVsFzf?controls=none&short_poll=true" width="800px" height="600px"></iframe>
---
-# What did we find oun our study?
+# What did we find in our studies?
.left-column50[
## Before Renting
-
+
]
--
.right-column50[
## After Renting
-
+
]
---
-# Edigs: Estimating Utilities Based on RECS [Compass 2018]
+# Edigs: Estimating Utilities From RECS
.column[
@@ -230,6 +219,7 @@ Spend greater percentages of income on energy
.column[
]
+.corner-ribbon.tr[COMPASS 2018]
---
# Existing Home Feedback Technology
@@ -242,7 +232,7 @@ Paucity of information about factors prospective tenants care about
- Housing quality
---
-# Other data could address intersecitonal issues
+# Other data could address intersectional issues
Housing choices linked to health outcomes & disability (lead, asthma, mold, air quality, etc.)
@@ -253,7 +243,7 @@ Sunlight [crowdsourced comparable estimates] -- impacts health & energy use
Noise -- impacts health/disability & comfort
---
-# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis
+# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis (8/10)
- Government Services & Civic Engagement
- Education
@@ -263,11 +253,11 @@ Noise -- impacts health/disability & comfort
---
-# ubigreen
+# ubi .green[green] (1/3)
.left-column[
-
+
]
@@ -275,37 +265,35 @@ Noise -- impacts health/disability & comfort
Investigating a Mobile Tool for Tracking and Supporting Green Transportation Habits [Froehlich et al, CHI 2009]
]
+
---
-.leftcolumn[
-## ubigreen
+# ubi .green[green] (2/3)
-Two formative studies
+.left-column[
+
-In-situ deployment
]
-.rightcolumn[
-
+.right-column[
+Two formative studies
+In-situ deployment
]
---
+# ubi .green[green] (3/3)
-
+
---
+---
# Real-time Recommendations
-post-study survey, “what could help you take more green tripsâ€
-
-- Reliable transportation (76.8%)
-- Financial incentives (71.4%)
-- Knowledge about alternatives (56%)
-
-future designs could suggest alternative forms of transit based on trip history
-
-recommendations could also come in form of neighborhood:
-
-- “42% of the people who live in your neighborhood and work in Capitol Hill take the bus.â€
+- post-study survey, “what could help you take more green tripsâ€
+ - Reliable transportation (76.8%)
+ - Financial incentives (71.4%)
+ - Knowledge about alternatives (56%)
+- future designs could suggest alternative forms of transit based on trip history
+- recommendations could also come in form of neighborhood:
+ - “42% of the people who live in your neighborhood and work in Capitol Hill take the bus.â€
---
# Potential for behavior change
@@ -319,40 +307,40 @@ recommendations could also come in form of neighborhood:
---
# But is this approach inclusive?
-.leftcolumn[
-
-]
-.small[[Project Sidewalk](http://projectsidewalk.org) combines remote crowdsourcing + machine learning to map and assess accessibility features of sidewalks]
+Sidewalks, public transit, and businesses can be inaccessible to those with disabilities
-
+.left-column30[
-.small[
-[AccessMap](http://accessmap.io) provides a personalized and interactive view of a city's accessibility, including road grade, sidewalk locations, and curb ramps)
-]
+
+
+
]
-.rightcolumn[
+.right-column70[
+
+.font-mediumsmall[[Project Sidewalk](http://projectsidewalk.org) combines remote crowdsourcing + machine learning to map and assess accessibility features of sidewalks]
-Problem: Sidewalks, public transit, and businesses can decrease car use but are inaccessible to those with disabilities
+.font-mediumsmall[[AccessMap](http://accessmap.io) provides a personalized and interactive view of a city's accessibility, including road grade, sidewalk locations, and curb ramps]
]
+
---
# Urban Accessibility and Mobility
-Problem: Sidewalks, public transit, and businesses can decrease car use but are inaccessible to those with disabilities
-
-Three-fold aim [All work by Froehlich & Caspi]:
+Sidewalks, public transit, and businesses can be inaccessible to those with disabilities. Three-fold aim [All work by Froehlich & Caspi]:
1. Develop scalable techniques to map and assess every sidewalk, transit stop, and business in the world
3. Create new digital tools that provide personalized routing, government accountability, and support new urban analytics.
3. Examine geo-spatial patterns of and influences on urban accessibility, barriers and facilitators of accessible infrastructure, and socio-cultural contexts of urban access across the globe.
---
-# Third Spaces also not accessible [Compass 2021]
+# Third Spaces also not accessible
+.corner-ribbon.tr[COMPASS 2021]
+
---
-# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis
+# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis (9/10)
- Government Services & Civic Engagement
- Education
@@ -363,17 +351,17 @@ Three-fold aim [All work by Froehlich & Caspi]:
- Who innovates matters and impacts what is made (back to education…)
---
-# Case study: Medical Making [Savage, TACCESS 22]
+# Case study: Medical Making
-Conflict between Community and Clinical Values in the U.S.
-- Have seen in multiple case studies
-- Wish to help where you can, right away vs “do no harmâ€
-- Emphasis on doing what you can vs longitudinal support/whole case management
-- Deeply rooted differences
-- One team member was threatened with COVID-infected artifacts when asking about safety
-
-Complete rift in one COVID site of study between medical making and community making
+- Conflict between Community and Clinical Values in the U.S.
+ - Have seen in multiple case studies
+ - Wish to help where you can, right away vs “do no harmâ€
+ - Emphasis on doing what you can vs longitudinal support/whole case management
+ - Deeply rooted differences
+ - One team member was threatened with COVID-infected artifacts when asking about safety
+- Complete rift in one COVID site of study between medical making and community making
+.corner-ribbon.tr[Savage, TACCESS 22]
---
# Study Population:
@@ -390,19 +378,16 @@ Makers; recipients; clinicians in seven countries
---
# Key differences between U.S. and other countries
-Multi-stakeholder collaborations (innovators and clinicians)
-- Formal collaborations with documented guidelines
-- Express support for follow up
-- Often include funding
-
-Community engagement
-- Families/community working and learning together
-
-Follow up included in process
-
-Legal context more forgiving?
----
-# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis
+- Multi-stakeholder collaborations (innovators and clinicians)
+ - Formal collaborations with documented guidelines
+ - Express support for follow up
+ - Often include funding
+- Community engagement
+ - Families/community working and learning together
+- Follow up included in process
+- Legal context more forgiving?
+---
+# A disability-informed technology agenda for addressing the climate crisis (10/10)
- Government Services & Civic Engagement
- Education