diff --git a/schedule.md b/schedule.md
index 9f073b484ff8e90eba68a4853a74eaa8f6c46611..6b0f02e8544eb1b6c8531dccc6bd8bea0ef25420 100644
--- a/schedule.md
+++ b/schedule.md
@@ -238,6 +238,11 @@ Discussion of Disability Dongle Paper
 - {: .homework} [Finding Accessibility](assignments/finding-accessibility.html) Assigned: Summarize a first person account of an access technology
 - {: .homework} **Post-module Reflection:**  [Accessibility Basics Reflection](https://forms.gle/Wk8C51m5Sbq8RX7W8)
 - **Required Readings** Respond  to the Reading Questions and Preparation Requirements on Ed
+    - Read [Fairness issues in AI Systems that augment sensory abilities](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1908.07333.pdf) and [**Respond on Ed**](https://edstem.org/us/courses/31170/discussion/2424082) 
+   - Read [A systematic literature review of handheld augmented reality solutions for people with disabilities](https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/20/7719) and [**Respond on Ed**](TODO)
+    - Read [7 benefits of AR and VR for People with Disabilities](https://arpost.co/2022/02/09/7-benefits-ar-vr-for-people-with-disability/) and [**Respond on Ed**](https://edstem.org/us/courses/31170/discussion/2423831) 
+
+
 
 {% enddetails %}
 
diff --git a/slides/designing.html b/slides/designing.html
index b61afee68479e515a6bf6c847a2c9b726fb7de1b..233f0fa6542aff59a098ec0152debcc1e0bb0283 100644
--- a/slides/designing.html
+++ b/slides/designing.html
@@ -389,6 +389,14 @@ So please, don’t do this to your audience members. Be a responsible presenter.
 - Make sure it is captioned
 - Make sure it has audio descriptions if non-verbal content is important
 
+---
+# Research Opportunity
+- I (Kelly) made a Google Slides Add-On that automatically checks for some accessibility issues
+- If you would like to test it, you can be in the study (use the tool, provide some feedback) and you will be compensated
+- **You do not have to participate in this study. Your grade will not be affected if you do or do not participate in this study.**
+
+![:img screenshot of the correction interface, it includes the features fix color contrast, give slides unique titles, identify slides missing layouts, identify missing alt text, identify bad linkt text, enlarge small fonts.](img/wk04/correction_interface.PNG)
+
 ---
 # Next Assignment: [AT Around Us](../assignments/finding-accessibility.html) (1 of 2)
 
diff --git a/slides/evaluation.html b/slides/evaluation.html
index f21a1fd57be7ee3722acb663e2c69caad181c891..33ae0e071b335b701160a265e5b0d3674116e452 100644
--- a/slides/evaluation.html
+++ b/slides/evaluation.html
@@ -64,10 +64,24 @@ Best Practices
 - Accessibility doesn't come by accident when planning studies
 - All research should be accessible research (regardless of if it is accessibility research)
 
+
+---
+#Lab Testing (often must take place in the home). 
+Best guidance: [Nielsen-Norman Group](http://www.nngroup.com/reports/accessibility/testing/); [Anticipate and Adjust](https://a11ykelly.medium.com/anticipate-and-adjust-cultivating-access-in-human-centered-methods-1e46c6845e34)
+
+Little details matter
+- How will you find participants?
+- How much do you know about the group your are targeting and what to expect from/of them?
+- How will you communicate? 
+- Can you duplicate the custom hardware/software they use, or must you go to them?
+- Do they have hardware you need (e.g. working monitor?)
+
+
+Anticipate and Adjust presents a workflow to help you in answering these questions.
+
 ---
 # Accessible Study Planning Workflow
-![:img A flow chart for planning accessible studies. The first two phases occur in parallel and are "identify stakeholders" and "identify tasks". These tasks flow into the "assign tasks" phase where one should consider access needs, effects of familiarity with the task, personal preferences, and other institutional constraints. The next phase is "planning accommodations", where one can consider the dimensions of communication, materials, time and space. And the final phase is reflect on the study plan while considering access synergies and conflicts and power dynamics.](img/assessment/grocery.png) 
-]
+![:img A flow chart for planning accessible studies. The first two phases occur in parallel and are "identify stakeholders" and "identify tasks". These tasks flow into the "assign tasks" phase where one should consider access needs, effects of familiarity with the task, personal preferences, and other institutional constraints. The next phase is "planning accommodations", where one can consider the dimensions of communication, materials, time and space. And the final phase is reflect on the study plan while considering access synergies and conflicts and power dynamics.](img/wk04/access_workflow.PNG)
 
 ---
 # An Example
@@ -179,17 +193,6 @@ Best Practices
 - Member checking
 
 
----
-#Lab Testing (often must take place in the home). 
-Best guidance: [Nielsen-Norman Group](http://www.nngroup.com/reports/accessibility/testing/); [Anticipate and Adjust](https://a11ykelly.medium.com/anticipate-and-adjust-cultivating-access-in-human-centered-methods-1e46c6845e34)
-
-Little details matter
-- How will you find participants?
-- How much do you know about the group your are targeting and what to expect from/of them?
-- How will you communicate? 
-- Can you duplicate the custom hardware/software they use, or must you go to them?
-- Do they have hardware you need (e.g. working monitor?)
-
 ---
 # Issues
 Heterogeneous Users
diff --git a/slides/img/wk04/correction_interface.png b/slides/img/wk04/correction_interface.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f6d0cd16da2014c04fd55246844e5a8bf2b33094
Binary files /dev/null and b/slides/img/wk04/correction_interface.png differ